NEW PRODUCT: JXK - Labrador (JXK209A/B/C)

Brand:JXK
Name: 1/6 Labrador
No. JXK209A/B/C
Product weight: 513g (The final weight of the product is subject to factory shipment)
Material: Resin
Product size: 21(L) × 11(W) × 9(H)cm
Packing box size: 27.5(L) × 20.5(W) × 11(H) cm
Preorder is available before: 9.1.2021
Release in: Early second quarter of 2024
selling point: Prevent bumps

Package list:
Labrador ×1


















#JXK #dog #pet #labrador

I was thinking "very nice"... until I saw the overly obvious branding, and some possibly exaggerated bits.

GubernatorFan wrote:I was thinking "very nice"... until I saw the overly obvious branding, and some possibly exaggerated bits.

I did think he is super cute. The branding could possibly be fixed with a little milliput and paint? 
I didn't even notice the "bits", and now I can't unsee them!  
Doesn't matter. I don't do docile and cute. I'm more the wolf and pit bull type.

Diana wrote:

GubernatorFan wrote:I was thinking "very nice"... until I saw the overly obvious branding, and some possibly exaggerated bits.

I did think he is super cute. The branding could possibly be fixed with a little milliput and paint? 
I didn't even notice the "bits", and now I can't unsee them!  
Doesn't matter. I don't do docile and cute. I'm more the wolf and pit bull type.

Yes, I agree. I don't really mind the occasional cute pose in and of itself, although it really limits possibilities. But at the risk of repeating myself (not that these guys are listening), it would be ideal if they put together, for a reasonable price (these are basically small animal statuettes like the Schleich or Papo or Safari Ltd ones for kids), a packet of the same animal in half a dozen poses. Then we get some versatility even with them. And, yes, one could obscure the branding, but should one need to, when all it takes is having a clue about design and some consideration on the part of the producer?

These companies are obsessed with male animal bits, ugh. As someone who has had some wonderful female animal companions, it is very annoying. Intact males are not that common amongst pets, nor amongst ridden horses! They want realism so badly, welp, chop those bollocks off and/or give us some mares and b*tches for once.

skywalkersaga wrote:These companies are obsessed with male animal bits, ugh. As someone who has had some wonderful female animal companions, it is very annoying. Intact males are not that common amongst pets, nor amongst ridden horses! They want realism so badly, welp, chop those bollocks off and/or give us some mares and b*tches for once.

So true.

Diana wrote:

skywalkersaga wrote:These companies are obsessed with male animal bits, ugh. As someone who has had some wonderful female animal companions, it is very annoying. Intact males are not that common amongst pets, nor amongst ridden horses! They want realism so badly, welp, chop those bollocks off and/or give us some mares and b*tches for once.

So true.

Amen. Although in principle I'm against chopping bits, they do overdo it. One can hardly ever notice them on cats, yet they emphasize them. And it would be nice to have some variety in the sexes of animals. I hate to say it, but it might be a cultural thing, the obsession with male being "better." Unless it come to boobs, of course, LOL.

Amen, Sky. Aside from the lioness figures, we don’t get enough females. And I agree about the wedding tackle — needs to be toned down.

Stryker2012 wrote:Amen, Sky. Aside from the lioness figures, we don’t get enough females. And I agree about the wedding tackle — needs to be toned down.

I had to look it up, but I've learned a new phrase today. Thanks, Mark. Just can't decide if this makes you a good or bad influence.