OneSixthFigures
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
OneSixthFigures

An online community to discuss and share news about sixth-scale figures, with an emphasis on either custom or commercial articulated figures.


You are not connected. Please login or register

NEW PRODUCT: HHmodel & HaoYuTOYS: 1/6 Empire Legion-Imperial Dato 'Single Player & Deluxe Edition

Go to page : Previous  1, 2

Go down  Message [Page 2 of 2]

GubernatorFan


Founding Father
shazzdan wrote:You've never handled any of these if you think they are impractical in battle. There are plenty of examples of heavily decorated equipment with battle damage. For the ancients, battle WAS parade. The whole point was to get noticed on the battlefield and to intimidate the enemy. Look up the concept of "conspicuous consumption". To gain renown and prestige, you get the most expensive stuff, use it up, throw it away, and get more. They ate meals with gold dust and crushed pearls sprinkled on top. They purchased the most expensive clothing and only wore it once.

Yes, to a point, although that tendency need not be considered universal or consistent and does not preclude some armor being meant more for show than function, and being worn accordingly. I thought they dissolved the pearls in vinegar or something like that.

https://onesixthfigures.forumotion.com

shazzdan


GubernatorFan wrote:Yes, to a point, although that tendency need not be considered universal or consistent and does not preclude some armor being meant more for show than function, and being worn accordingly. I thought they dissolved the pearls in vinegar or something like that.
Who said anything about it being universal? It applies to the Romans, which is all that matters in this context. There was no such thing as Roman parade armour. The armour they wore in triumphs was the same armour they wore in battle. A commander might not expect to see direct fighting but that didn't mean that his fancy helmet wasn't worn on the battlefield. The lower ranked officers and NCOs most definitely wore them in battle and they considered it a virtue for them to get damaged. Anyone who came out of a battle with no damage to their gear was accused of not pulling their weight if not of outright cowardice. Damaged armour gave them "bragging rights"; the more damaged, the better. They would get the armourer to fix it afterwards but would not want it looking "like new". Undamaged equipment marks you out as a rookie, or worse, a coward.

https://www.etsy.com/au/shop/OneSixthArsenal

ahbake


I'm wondering if these guys might give us a Laurence Olivier Crassus look-a-like from Spartacus... he, too, had quite a flamboyant armour.

shazzdan


ahbake wrote:I'm wondering if these guys might give us a Laurence Olivier Crassus look-a-like from Spartacus... he, too, had quite a flamboyant armour.

roman - NEW PRODUCT: HHmodel & HaoYuTOYS: 1/6 Empire Legion-Imperial Dato 'Single Player & Deluxe Edition - Page 2 E35254b1346052a432f9b57da3bd3dae

https://www.etsy.com/au/shop/OneSixthArsenal

ahbake


Glorious.

Sponsored content


Back to top  Message [Page 2 of 2]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum