[quote="
Also, realistic characters have always been beyond the two-dimensional, white-or-black-hat portrayal - in truthful representation to man’s inherent complexity; shades of gray, per se. Or as Walt Whitman had put it, "I contain multitudes..."
I suppose that my point here is that, given the degree of unavoidable similarity of circumstances, themselves; the challenge of originality truly depends upon one’s vision for that which has not been so predetermined by situation - but rather, the conceptualization of new responses and new situations…
Just pondering aloud. [/quote]
There are only so many apocalyptic scenarios we can think of; Nuclear war, alien invasion, asteroid strike, global warming and or global resource depletion, plague, zombies, scientific experiment gone awry, massive coronal ejection from the sun, rise of the machines.....
But all of these really only serve a purpose, which is create a setting for the protagonists of our stories to live or die by. At the end of the day, we can only milk the cause of the disaster so far and it's the interactions between the humans, be they the heroes or villains of the story or both that give depth to the story. An asteroid crashing into the Earth, a nuclear weapon exploding over your home city, a plague....these things have no feelings, no thoughts. Simply destructive power without a purpose and indifferent to what lies in its path. So regardless of the originality of the concept, if indeed such a thing still exists, what makes a story enjoyable would be the quality of it's characters.
Also, realistic characters have always been beyond the two-dimensional, white-or-black-hat portrayal - in truthful representation to man’s inherent complexity; shades of gray, per se. Or as Walt Whitman had put it, "I contain multitudes..."
I suppose that my point here is that, given the degree of unavoidable similarity of circumstances, themselves; the challenge of originality truly depends upon one’s vision for that which has not been so predetermined by situation - but rather, the conceptualization of new responses and new situations…
Just pondering aloud. [/quote]
There are only so many apocalyptic scenarios we can think of; Nuclear war, alien invasion, asteroid strike, global warming and or global resource depletion, plague, zombies, scientific experiment gone awry, massive coronal ejection from the sun, rise of the machines.....
But all of these really only serve a purpose, which is create a setting for the protagonists of our stories to live or die by. At the end of the day, we can only milk the cause of the disaster so far and it's the interactions between the humans, be they the heroes or villains of the story or both that give depth to the story. An asteroid crashing into the Earth, a nuclear weapon exploding over your home city, a plague....these things have no feelings, no thoughts. Simply destructive power without a purpose and indifferent to what lies in its path. So regardless of the originality of the concept, if indeed such a thing still exists, what makes a story enjoyable would be the quality of it's characters.