Moonbase Alpha Male wrote:What does it mean to "get the height 'right' for Leia?" At what point do you "aim at intentionally getting the height wrong"? It's not just stage presence. Carrie Fisher was standing on a box for all of her medium shots and close-ups in 3 movies, particularly where she had to approximate eye level with Harrison Ford. "Standing on a box" is a level of technology that predates CGI. So her IRL 5'1" isn't really relevant to anything except mostly group longshots. So what do you do for 1/6 display, especially if it's her and Han? If you're really brave, you give her a 10.15" body, and you put her on an actual 1/6 crate next to Han, because that's what the camera saw, but you're going to get a lot of questions. If you want to memorialize some conversation we saw Leia having with Han, you're going to have to bite the bullet and pretend she's almost a foot taller, because that is what you saw on screen, even though it was achieved standing on a box. The IRL alternative with Leia's eye level around Harrison's navel won't look right. So, compromise is inevitable. GF, that was a great post with a great pic in it, well done.
Thank you, glad you liked the thread -- there is actually a second pic (actually more than that) with more figures in later posts in the same thread. As for getting the height right, you bring up an issue of which I was not aware. I'm used to think of Leia as substantially shorter than Han, and certainly very much shorter than Vader and Chewbacca. But I had no idea she was standing on a crate (I assume in different shots than those). So you raise a valid conundrum. But, yes, I am pedant enough to put her on a body as close in height as her real height and then find out what the crate looked like and keep something like it ready for deployment.
Come to think of it, I may have resorted to a platform in a couple of my photo stories, but I can't remember when and where right off the top of my head. I don't think I did so in the most recent ones. And there was certainly no crate in shots where people were walking down a hallway, etc., and their entire figures were visible.
skywalkersaga wrote:For me, I care about how the figures look together. I quite the height difference between Han and Leia, so prefer to see that captured in the figures, too. : )
I agree with you there. Not only is it more realistic vis-a-vis the actors, but it also creates a sort of variety (that one might expect to be more realistic) across the range of action figures one might have standing around. On the other hand, I don't think what Very Cool did with Mad Max and Furiosa was right (making her unrealistically small and short, when she was almost the same size as him -- if I recall correctly). I should have included those two in the Action Figure Height thread, shouldn't I?
Stryker2011 wrote:I imagine a smaller body would be somewhat tricky without modifications to not just the bra-cup size, but also the waist-band (not easy considering the plastic used to make the loin-cloth connectors). The easiest would probably be trimming the length of said skirting and rehemming (especially if there is a wire in the bottom), and the boots will come across as over-sized. All that is to say... eh, use the recommended body since she’s mostly sitting or reclining most of the time anyway in this outfit.
In principle this is true, but I'm not sure it would make that much of a difference. The bra might fit well enough, and arguably better (here it looks like it barely fits on the bigger body), and I would hope the hips would be wide enough to work with waist-band. In truth, I think we would have to wait and see. I wonder about leaving the seamless body permanently in that reclining position, although I realize the nature of your diorama would invite exactly that.