Peaches wrote:Wow, very nice! Art within art within art! Figures, drawings, diorama and photography, so one more art needed, LOL
Somehow I missed this comment! Lol! Yeah, I had to figure out a way to fake Collossus's painting and sketches, since it's way beyond my artistic abaility. So thankful for photoshop. It's funny, because I always think of the figures as the project, but short of inviting everyone over (I mean, you all ARE invited over) I had to figure out how to take decent pictures to share online, and somehow that kinda became it's own thing.
Peaches wrote:I like the way @skywalkersaga expressed how the series of pictures gives a sense of vulnerability, to cold, to relaxing and being finished and warming up with the blanket, etc.. I can't say it so well, but ditto there, LOL
And thank so much for that. It feels like that kind of moment in my head, but then I always worry if these attributes come across at all. So it's incredible and a huge relief to hear when they do.
skywalkersaga wrote:Aww, cheers, Peaches, glad you agree.
And it doesn't sound pretentious at all, Rev. Anything that one approaches with such creativity and artistry can and should be considered 'art' -- whether it be photography, film, writing, drawing, painting, sculpture, digital art, music, and yes, even 1/6 figures. ;p Even moreso since you also have told a little story here -- imo, storytelling is both an art and a craft.
As Peaches noted, this is 'art within art'....within art. Your figures can be considered works of art themselves, and then you have one of them capturing the beauty of the other, and creating a piece of art himself as well. Then you have, in turn, gone back and re-captured it all via your photography. It's all so deliciously 'meta'.
And thank you both on this. I hadn't even thought about it like that, but it really does become a meta hall of mirrors at some point.
I always struggle to refer to anything I do as art. My brain always bucks at the term, and just won't accept it.
skywalkersaga wrote:And ha, yes, it totally counts as fanfiction! The fact that you have taken existing characters, made them your 'own', and then told a story with them is precisely the definition of that particular kind of fanwork. Yours just happens to have the added bonus of being told visually! : ) What characterizes fanfiction in my eyes is that it tends to pay loving homage to the source material while simultaneously transforming it into something else. Others have noted that your work often has a cinematic quality, and I would agree... I greatly enjoy seeing how you synthesize your obvious love of the original material -- whether it be film, tv, comics, animation, etc -- into something that expresses your own aesthetic preferences as well as your interpretations of each fictional 'verse and its respective characters.
Beautifully put, and an incredible thing to hear. There are figures I've done that I've tried to be as faithful as I could be, but I often joke that my "fanart" figures are approached as if someone handed me the franchise, and I could keep what I wanted and redesign what I didn't. I'm a voracious consumer of media, and a huge fanboy. Hell, even my original characters wear their influences on their sleeves, even if a lot of them were about looking for a fresh angle on familiar concepts.
Peaches wrote:@skywalkersaga said "It's all so deliciously 'meta'. Very Happy "
LOL, Yah! You make me sound cool, LOL
You are cool! I got the same takeaway from what you said.
brassco wrote:I bet you would do Mystique once it's released...the little details are what matters to make it realistic...
thks for sharing !
I want to do a mystique so bad! I was so close to getting the ToysEra one, but was so skeptical about the quality of their seamless body. It took Phicen a lot of tries to get it right, so who knows what you're getting with them. Did that ever come out, and did anyone pick it up? I'm planning to try the trick with the pastels and just go at it myself. Now to just figure out what Mystique's sense of fashion is...